I don't care bout what Bart Ehrman said, what he says does make sense and more convincing than the other scholar, alas it doesn't matter.
The MAIN point here is there ARE contradictions in the bible, agreed by both scholars.
Given two books, one with contradictions and another one with none, which one would you choose to believe?
PS. Im trying to find debates on the authenticity of the Quran by SCHOLARS (not missionaries). Do let me know if you find one!
0 comments:
Post a Comment